Business Models
Horizontal Integration
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Horizontal integration is a growth strategy in which a company increases its scale at the same stage of the value chain within the same industry, either by expanding internally or by acquiring and merging with competitors. It stands in explicit contrast to vertical integration, which instead spans different stages of production, and can raise antitrust concerns about monopoly pricing.
Facts
Core MechanismTwo or more firms operating at the same production level combine, through merger, acquisition or internal expansion, so their combined output and market share exceed what either could achieve alone. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Illustrated by the 2015 Heinz-Kraft merger, a $46 billion horizontal integration within food and beverage.
Standard Oil's early consolidation of competing refineries through acquisition is a textbook case of horizontal integration, distinct from its later vertical move into pipelines and distribution (already cited to this atlas's Vertical Integration entity).
The two strategies are defined as an explicit contrast pair by the source article itself: same production stage, expanded in scale, versus different production stages, brought under one roof.
Contains
Sources
1. Wikipedia, Horizontal Integration
WikipediaLead sectionQuote, Lead section
Horizontal integration is the process of a company increasing production of goods or services at the same level of the value chain, in the same industry.
1. Wikipedia, Horizontal Integration
WikipediaAspects sectionQuote, Aspects section
The three forms of horizontal integration are mergers, acquisitions and internal expansion.
1. Wikipedia, Horizontal Integration
WikipediaRecent mergers section, Heinz-KraftQuote, Recent mergers section, Heinz-Kraft
On 25 March 2015, Heinz and Kraft merged into one company, with the deal valued at $46 billion. Both produce processed food for the consumer market.
Wikipedia, Standard Oil
WikipediaAssociated With: Standard Oil, Founding and early years sectionQuote, Associated With: Standard Oil, Founding and early years section
The company grew by increasing sales and through acquisitions. After purchasing competing firms, Rockefeller shut down those he believed to be inefficient and kept the others.
Open Questions (1 open question)
Is there a documented year or event that marks the origin of horizontal integration as a named business strategy?
Wikipedia's article on horizontal integration defines the strategy but gives no historical origin date, citing only modern mergers (Heinz-Kraft 2015, Marriott-Starwood 2015, AB InBev-SABMiller 2016, Disney-21st Century Fox 2019) as examples. The strategy is far older; Standard Oil's 1870s-1880s consolidation of refining capacity is widely cited elsewhere as a classic 19th-century instance, but no source found in this research names a coining date or first-use event for the term or the strategy.
What would resolve this A business-history or economics source documenting when horizontal integration first emerged as a named, recognized strategy, or one explicitly stating the concept has no single origin because it describes a strategy practiced informally long before it was named.
Wikipedia, Horizontal Integration
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between horizontal and vertical integration?
Horizontal integration combines firms at the SAME stage of production (two competitors merging); vertical integration brings DIFFERENT stages under one company (a manufacturer acquiring its own supplier or distributor).
Horizontal integration and vertical integration both grow a company by combining operations, but along different axes of the same industry. Horizontal integration combines two or more firms operating at the SAME stage of production, for example two steelmakers merging, so the combined company gains scale and market share at that one stage. Vertical integration instead brings DIFFERENT stages of production under one roof, for example a steelmaker acquiring its own iron-ore mines or its own distribution network, so the company internalizes transactions that would otherwise cross a market interface between separate firms. The two strategies are not mutually exclusive; a company can pursue both over time, but each raises a different kind of concern: horizontal integration can concentrate market share within one stage and raise antitrust concerns about monopoly pricing, while vertical integration raises questions about foreclosing competitors' access to supply or distribution.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.